Jose Chameleone’s upcoming Unlimited concert has become the centre of an unexpected conversation after a reported UGX 1 million ticket offer from fellow singer King Michael took an awkward turn during a TikTok Live session.
The Leone Island boss is preparing for his upcoming performance at Lugogo Cricket Oval, and fans have reportedly been supporting the concert by purchasing tickets during his online appearances.
During one such TikTok Live, King Michael joined the supporters and announced that he was willing to buy tickets worth UGX 1 million.

However, according to a report by Exclusive, Chameleone went off camera shortly after the offer was made and later exited the live broadcast, leaving viewers questioning his reaction.
King Michael, meanwhile, maintained that he was still willing to make the contribution despite Chameleone’s departure.
“I have a million shillings for him. Even though he has left, I will give the money to Basiima. I have bought the tickets, and you can tell him to come back online,” King Michael said.
The exchange has drawn attention because the two musicians have previously had a public disagreement.
King Michael recently criticised Chameleone, accusing him of being selfish. He also claimed that a previous business arrangement between them ended badly, alleging that he lost money in the deal.
According to the source report, King Michael had subsequently vowed not to do business with Chameleone again.
The reported ticket offer therefore comes against the backdrop of an already strained relationship, making the moment on TikTok Live particularly notable.
However, the exact reason Chameleone left the broadcast remains unclear. His departure alone does not establish whether he deliberately rejected the money, was uncomfortable with the offer or simply chose to leave the session.
For now, the attention remains on the upcoming Unlimited concert and whether the two musicians will have any further interaction before the event.
Editorial note: The source reports that Chameleone left the live session after King Michael’s offer, but does not establish that he explicitly rejected the money. The headline and article therefore distinguish the reported sequence of events from the reason behind his departure.
