Ugandan musician-turned-politician Sir Mathias Walukaga is officially fighting back—and this time, he’s taking the battle straight to court.
The celebrated kadongo kamu singer and aspiring Busiro East Member of Parliament has filed a legal challenge against the Electoral Commission (EC) following his controversial removal from the parliamentary race, a move that has ignited political outrage and sparked fresh debate over fairness, transparency, and electoral justice in Uganda.
Walukaga Takes Electoral Commission to High Court
Through his legal team, led by Erias Nalukoola Luyimbazi and Alex Luganda, Walukaga has filed a petition before the Civil Division of the High Court, seeking to overturn the EC’s decision and reinstate him as a valid candidate.
The petition challenges the legality and credibility of the EC’s actions, which Walukaga’s lawyers describe as unjust, procedurally flawed, and politically damaging—not just to their client, but to the democratic process itself.
Why Was Walukaga Disqualified?
The legal action follows the circulation of a document on Tuesday, purportedly issued by the Electoral Commission, which quickly went viral online.
According to the document, Sir Mathias Walukaga was disqualified from the Busiro East MP race on the grounds that he allegedly lacked the minimum academic qualifications required for nomination.
The announcement sent shockwaves across political and entertainment circles, especially given Walukaga’s strong grassroots following and rising profile within opposition politics.
NUP Reacts Swiftly: “This Is Unfair and Irregular”
The decision immediately drew a fierce response from the National Unity Platform (NUP), the party under which Walukaga is contesting.
NUP’s Secretary General, David Lewis Rubongoya, publicly condemned the move, describing it as unfair, irregular, and legally questionable.
Rubongoya confirmed that the party would petition the High Court to challenge the EC’s decision, signaling that Walukaga’s case is not just a personal fight—but a party-backed legal showdown.
“We shall challenge this unfair and irregular decision in court,” Rubongoya stated.
The party insists that due process was not followed and that the decision raises serious concerns about consistency and transparency in candidate vetting.
Walukaga’s Legal Team: “He Meets All Requirements”
Speaking to the media, Lead Counsel Erias Nalukoola expressed strong confidence in their case, making it clear that they believe the law is firmly on Walukaga’s side.
“We are confident justice will prevail and Walukaga will return to the ballot,” Nalukoola said.
According to the legal team, Walukaga has fully complied with all legal and academic requirements stipulated by electoral laws and should therefore be allowed to continue as the NUP flag bearer for Busiro East.
They argue that the EC’s decision is not only flawed but also sets a dangerous precedent for future elections.
From Music Icon to Political Contender
Sir Mathias Walukaga is no stranger to public life.
Long celebrated for his socially conscious kadongo kamu music, Walukaga has built a reputation as a voice of the people, often using his art to address corruption, inequality, and governance issues.
His transition into active politics has been closely watched, with many supporters viewing his candidacy as a natural evolution of his activism.
For residents of Busiro East, Walukaga represents:
- A familiar and trusted public figure
- A grassroots-oriented leader
- A symbol of cultural and political resistance
His removal from the race has therefore struck a nerve with supporters who believe his popularity may have made him a political threat.
Public Reaction: Fans and Supporters Speak Out
Following news of the disqualification, social media platforms lit up with reactions from fans, voters, and political commentators.
Many questioned:
- Why the issue surfaced at this stage of the process
- Whether similar standards are applied consistently to all candidates
- If political bias played a role in the decision
Supporters have rallied behind Walukaga, urging him to “stand firm” and pursue justice to the end.
The Bigger Question: Academic Qualifications in Politics
Walukaga’s case has reopened a long-running national conversation about academic qualifications and leadership.
Critics argue that:
- Leadership should be measured by competence and integrity, not papers alone
- Many effective leaders globally lack advanced academic credentials
- The requirement is often used selectively
Supporters of the law, however, maintain that minimum academic standards help preserve professionalism in governance.
Regardless of where one stands, Walukaga’s case has once again placed the issue at the center of Uganda’s political discourse.
What Happens Next?
With petitions now filed, the spotlight shifts to the High Court, which will determine:
- Whether the EC acted lawfully
- If Walukaga meets nomination requirements
- Whether he should be reinstated on the ballot
Legal analysts say the ruling could have far-reaching implications, not just for Busiro East, but for how future electoral disputes are handled.
NUP Stands Firm Behind Its Candidate
Despite the uncertainty, NUP leaders have made it clear they are fully backing Walukaga, describing him as their legitimate and lawful candidate.
Party insiders say preparations are ongoing as they await the court’s guidance, confident that the legal system will correct what they see as a serious error.
A Defining Moment for Walukaga
For Sir Mathias Walukaga, this legal battle may prove to be one of the most defining moments of his political journey.
Win or lose, the case has:
- Elevated his national profile
- Solidified his support base
- Positioned him as a symbol of resistance against perceived injustice
As one supporter wrote online, “If he can fight for his place on the ballot, he can fight for us in Parliament.”
All Eyes on the Courts
As Uganda waits for the next legal move, one thing is certain: this story is far from over.
Whether Sir Mathias Walukaga makes it back onto the Busiro East ballot now lies in the hands of the courts—but the political impact of his disqualification is already being felt
💬 Do you think the Electoral Commission acted fairly in Walukaga’s case?
🗳️ Should academic qualifications determine who can lead?
Share your thoughts below and stay locked to E Page One for breaking updates on this developing political showdown.
