What started as a dispute over social media accounts has now exploded into a much bigger battle involving money, ownership, and the rights of child creators.
And leading the charge is Bruno K.
The outspoken singer has publicly thrown his support behind viral child sensation Tenge Tenge and his management team, accusing Black Market Records of profiting from content allegedly linked to the youngster without properly compensating those behind it.
Over the past several days, Bruno K has unleashed a series of strongly worded social media posts demanding answers from the music distribution company.
His message has been consistent throughout:
The children deserve to be paid.
And according to Bruno, that’s exactly what this fight is about.

Bruno K Takes Aim at Black Market Records
The singer first entered the conversation after seeing discussions involving Tenge Tenge’s viral “Tengelere” sound and questions surrounding ownership rights.
Responding to statements made by music executive Gabriel Buule, Bruno urged him to speak out on behalf of the children involved.
“My brother Gabriel Buule, you are too silent. You are a father and a Christian. These two kids deserve to be paid. Talk to your bosses,” Bruno wrote.
The comments immediately gained traction online as fans followed the growing dispute.
But that was only the beginning.
Bruno soon escalated his criticism by accusing Black Market Records of exploiting young talent.
“Another talented child who is a victim to Black Market exploitation. All they say is Ugandans can’t do anything to them. Who is the minister responsible for kids?” he posted.
The accusations quickly became one of the hottest topics in Uganda’s entertainment circles.
And then things got even more explosive.
The Shs1.5 Billion Claim
In one of his most widely shared posts, Bruno K challenged Black Market Records to explain revenue allegedly generated from the viral Tenge Tenge sound.
“Black Market Records should explain to the world where they put the 1.5 billion Ugandan shillings they made from The Tenge Tenge sound,” Bruno alleged.
The singer further claimed that the company did not have a contract with Tenge Tenge and therefore had no authority to distribute the content.
According to Bruno, the distribution happened without the permission of either the young creator or his management team.
At this stage, those claims remain allegations made publicly by Bruno K.
No evidence independently verifying the Shs1.5 billion figure was included in the information provided, and Black Market Records has not publicly responded within the source material.
Nevertheless, the allegations have fueled intense discussion online.
Manager Mike’s Evidence Claim
Bruno K later claimed he had received evidence directly from Tenge Tenge’s manager, Michael.
“Manager Mike just sent me this evidence. Please Black Market Records pay Tenge Tenge and his management. Black Market Records forcefully copyrighted this project and they had no contract with Tenge.”
The singer further alleged that similar practices may have affected other Ugandan creatives.
“This is how you guys have been stealing from so many Ugandan talents,” he claimed.
Those remarks dramatically increased public attention on the dispute, with many fans calling for transparency from all parties involved.
But that’s not even the biggest reason people are paying attention.
Bruno Says This Is Bigger Than Tenge Tenge
For Bruno K, the issue appears to go beyond one viral star.
Throughout his posts, the singer has repeatedly framed the dispute as a fight for young creatives who may not have the power or resources to defend themselves.
His focus has largely been on ensuring that the children involved benefit from the success of content they helped create.
Fans immediately noticed that Bruno’s argument isn’t centered on personal gain.
Instead, he has positioned himself as an advocate for the youngsters at the heart of the controversy.
That stance has earned him praise from supporters who believe child creators deserve stronger protection within the entertainment industry.
The Ownership Debate
The controversy intensified further after Gabriel Buule argued that Tenge Tenge was not the original composer of the “Tengelere” sound.
According to Buule, the original composer was Boi Blaze, who reportedly created the sound with two other children and later authorized Black Market Records to distribute it.
Buule also stated that Boi Blaze patented the master recording.
Those claims have complicated an already confusing situation, creating competing narratives over ownership, rights, and revenue distribution.
As a result, fans are finding themselves caught between multiple versions of the story.
And the internet has plenty of opinions.
Social Media Erupts
The internet had thoughts—and they were not holding back.
Supporters of Bruno K applauded his willingness to challenge a major company publicly.
Others argued that all contractual agreements and ownership documents should be made public before conclusions are drawn.
Some fans questioned whether Uganda’s entertainment industry offers enough protection for young creators whose content generates significant online revenue.
Within hours, screenshots of Bruno’s posts were circulating across entertainment blogs, TikTok pages, and social media platforms.
The debate quickly evolved from a dispute about one sound into a broader conversation about artist rights and child talent protection.
Why This Story Matters
Beyond the allegations and online arguments lies a serious question.
Who should benefit when content created by children generates substantial revenue?
It’s a question that resonates far beyond Tenge Tenge.
As social media continues creating new stars at unprecedented speed, disputes involving ownership, contracts, and earnings are becoming increasingly common.
That reality is why many observers are watching this case closely.
The outcome could shape how future relationships between young creators, managers, and distributors are handled.
The Twist
What began as a disagreement over a viral sound has now transformed into a high-profile battle about accountability, compensation, and the protection of child talent.
And with Bruno K refusing to back down, the pressure for answers is only growing louder.
Bruno K says this fight isn’t about headlines—it’s about making sure children benefit from the success they help create. The question now is whether the growing calls for transparency will finally force all sides to put their cards on the table.
Editorial Note: The allegations referenced in this article were made publicly by Bruno K through social media posts. They remain claims and have not been independently verified based on the information provided. Black Market Records’ response was not included in the source material.
